One could always worth insisting to explain something that is very simple. Why is it more sensible to be left from right? For a very clear reason: Because it is right.
However, as the right has always tried to adhere to the morality that is most pragmatically appropriate, this argument is not so easy to define as it seems.
But yeah. It is eminently simple. And this truism is that so many social groups to explain to choke someone as stupid as certain, which is Hugo Chavez. O so gray but as pragmatic as it has been Néstor Kirchner.
what lies the heart of the problem? That, rightly or wrongly, the welfare of many almost always depends on the sacrifice of the few. Think of France: The fiscal and tax scheme would be unacceptable to many of the "other" western countries. However, our democracy works. And not just work: Even conservatives have held power for more than twelve years. And although many issues relating to U.S. foreign policy have changed, the fact is that the standard of living and working conditions have remained almost intact. Why? Because France is not afraid of democracy. How? Through a participatory society in which many countries would envy.
Think not only in health but in any other worthy social symptom manifestation. In Mexico, I have memory, all those who dare to take to the streets are immediately branded as "PRD" violent. Disrespectful, rebellious against the institutions. Insurmountable.
Yet, Mexico has never climbed any violence could break 15 cars in a week. Never such "violence" has gone from the streets. Never had any of this violence has actually "stopped" the country. But yes: A lot governments have not noticed baptize as major destabilizing the nation, and then suppress them with bare hands or dirty gloves.
really are dead. Are no better than Guatemala or El Salvador, even Honduras, at least as far as democracy is concerned. We are wrong, we're crazy. And although our conviction is la de prestar atención, eso no habrá de salvarnos mayormente. No somos nada. Y no lo somos, porque no lo queremos.
México no tiene rango de juego. Ni mucho menos lo tiene Estados Unidos. Como bien dice Michael Moore, en su último documental, el imperio y sus cachorros sólo esperan el momento en el que puedan desesperanzar a la gente. Porque ciertamente es más manejable aquel pueblo aterrado de sus gobernantes -ese, comprador de armas que pretenden hacerle sentir en control- que aquel "otro" gobierno, ese realmente aterrado de sus pobladores: porque son capaces de diferir, discernir, pensar y concluir.
Y por eso es que nos enfrentamos ante un monstruo jamás antes visto. El monstruo de la conformidad y contempt for others. The monster of silence and we'll see. The monster now. The monster from scratch.
We are condemned to die. Even in the best cities in the world. Even in Manhattan and Brooklyn: There is nothing we can cope with the insurmountable fact that we will remain alone, or leave alone those who love us: We will die on our own will. The willingness of development. The way of the future, industry, desire. All buried under the impossibility of being all players. Because you can. Because really, there is room for all stories.
But no matter. Persist. Shut up. Continue. We will believe soldiers, rescue workers, deserving of care. Michael Moore's of petatiux.
Although in the end, always resound the same epitaph: "Hasta la victoria siempre." And while Disney says "And beyond."
After that we made.
0 comments:
Post a Comment