Panic in the henhouse. the "burden" of the beautiful people In an unprecedented event, nearly comparable to the remote "
We are the World, USA for AFRICA "1985, in which representatives and stars of antagonistic views and television networks in the United States meet in a media campaign (with a touch of house) on the pretext of helping Africa, attended yesterday-in the sacred Senate, dozens of "journalists" and Mexican television star pretext of "saving" their television and radio companies of electoral reform (and incidentally continue giving humanitarian aid to themselves).
The New War reform
In short, the reform raises the camera to centralize the electoral media promotion and to locate only on official time, owned by the state, ending once and for all, with politics predigested and served in presentations of 15, 20 or 30 seconds, porridge "gerber" consciousness has manipulated the fate of the last three presidential elections , with the last four presidential administrations (remember it was Salinas who opened the media blitz, especially on television, with ads that promoted his epic the "Solidarity").
Is the abstract? The parties may not charitable in the media (directly) your budget, or may employ eSPOTS television and radio, but will be subject to official times (about 48 minutes per day on each channel) and they were allocated (in a way that is not clear yet) among the different political forces.
result? Broadcasters will win (because every second of television advertising becomes net, removing the taxes that pay poorly, and that goes directly to the accounts of the above "journalists" and their bosses and minions), at least some $ 100 million in every presidential election, joined the same in the middle, along with another small amount of promotion will be lost in non-election times (like now) and become parties like PAN, which as is prescribed in 15 seconds do so because "they work for you." At the end of the day, less money for the television but not necessarily greater electoral justice. A necessary but insufficient reform.
Life without tele-prompter is not life. is no wonder that Javier Alatorre and Joaquín López-Doriga appear, almost holding hands, one with his manly cowboy mustache and the other with a pink sweater risky (it is strange that were reversed, but that TV, an underworld nation of simulation, where everyone lives in a separate closet, but of course, full of U.S. dollars), and together they care, with its limited capacity argumentative (it should be noted that are not even remotely as effective without his or her teleprompter pointer), to convince legislators that this reform is demonic attack on freedom of expression and tramples the constitutional rights of Mexicans (or at least the "poor "Mexicans who earn fortunes to win these" communicators "and jefecito, victims and Azcarraga, Salinas Pliego, etc.).
" you that mustache looks good, Javier."
"Oh, and I love your sweater, Joachim ..."
Surrealism in
country of the simulation (aerobics for political consciousness) surreal a scenario worthy of our country of appearances and deception. The maximum cajoled our society, apendejadores par excellence, the owners of the consciousness of the average citizen idiotically, defending "like dogs" the constitution and its values. Freedom of expression, they criticize the same discretion when candidates are not to your liking or convenience or when news is not profitable, is in this pathetic puppet to his fiercest defenders. And the city, the same as idiotically decided to vote according to the gestures of Joaquin, Javier or Paty Chapoy, and truly "forge" their political leanings based on what I have for 20 seconds (light weight, high reps, then so are the aerobics of televised politics) in a makeup espot news or flavored Chayo Today should be raised consternation, remorseful and devastated by the fact that opinion leaders will not receive the same bonuses every six years and are very upset with the political power that has taken away a little of your birdseed.
"At least give us our Chayo ..." broody hens, roosters that do not tread, birds in the yard of Cynicism: Our "journalists" cluck their discontent as ever, and as vile hauled-those who they criticize when describing the civilized and respectful of the institutions in which they live-just pile up and forget their differences to pray that they do not remove the multibillion-dollar policy of the dumbing down of Mexico.
According to the information contained in the newspapers, the "charged" the 11-S began as a beautiful and diverse picture in which communicators civilized presented his arguments against the reform, arguing that it is "almost expropriation" (Rogerio Azcarraga , Radio Formula) and who intends to return to Mexico "to the era of the Soviet Union (sic)" (La Jornada, September 12, 2007). Once passed, these cowardly arguments (just to suggest that Mexico has never been a country that Soviet-era censorship PRI was always founded on consensus and the convenience of owners who mourn today dollars), the owners wielded his true motives and exposed to reform the would lose money and break at least 950 radio stations, including many of their financial losses.
one puñadote dollars. So it was money, as expected. Worse, the liquefied national excellence: Money and lies. What big corporations could not simply subsidize their own stations radio at risk with the huge profits generated by television stations or older? Do you think the legislators do not know their numbers and figures shameful in itself and is generated without the support of political parties and their money are almost always dirty? Or is the political and economic costs of everything always has to pay the Mexican society, and by dumbing down, either by taxes or to endure and rulers erected at 100% by the money that flooded the media, as was the case of the hapless village idiot who occupied Los Pinos past 6 years?
Miracle (or concertacesión) in camera.
Senators, mostly fully understood what had to be done, and silenced most of these pathetic complaint with the simple argument that the electronic media are property of the nation, the state concession as he pleases. And wielding the argument further: This is not a law shroud. For as there is free enterprise, Televisa, Azteca and its subsidiaries and partners and which have multiplied their money annually, the state also is in total freedom to decide how to use and where to spend your money. And to define how much air time you have to give you please use either the demand or the nation's national time, that God does not listen and does not care or their producers.
Strictly speaking, the networks are not "Chavizadas" or silenced. Are the parties that are tied by this reform, and is the state that finally put in place, as regulator of electoral justice and keeper of the public money. And at that point the television without interference. Must submit and go through with.
The real limitations of reform However, it is time to take celebrate. Electoral reform is extremely poor, and the point with respect to the television is not even well thought out. Do the lawmakers forget the dozens of "civil associations", the COPARMEX, the CONCANACO, the CCE and the multiple entities espotizaron the 2006 election? Do you think that the parties to stop stop the nonsense on TV? Do they forget that the electoral machinery of Fox and the PAN in 2006 had many more fronts against Lopez Obrador spots and vice versa? The
eSPOTS follow. AC dressed like "a better country" and "Mexico United against violence." Sulking in organizations like the Friends of Fox "and obscurantist checks that swarm at election time, the puppet masters continue to move their little threads, and, although today morning cry-communicators will realize that his friends have found investors the shape of turning to the law and continue to pay for a Mexico plunged into the ideology of the 20 seconds and premature ejaculation ignorance. And that's where lawmakers fail, and where there has been far can the investor determined to build doctrine. And in the house now is panic, but tomorrow will return the golden eggs.
Paty Chapoy, cuasiprimera lady of the political consciousness of our country, relentless journalist dedicated to the greatest number of trinkets and frivolities that will fit on the head, and dedicated reporter, was kind enough to ask if she "claims that this or which is handsome governor, would become a criminal act "under the new law.
I do not know how nobody told him his comments would not be at all criminal. Just like everything he says and does, is irrelevant. Like her.
